Best Price Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Buy Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras today at the best price and it's limited time offer. Look at our special deals today on our store. Get more and spend less when you buy Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Also read our Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras reviews before you decide to buy Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Anything you have to know about this item, The Best Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Buy Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras at Best Price
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Many customers was gave reviews and ratings to Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. If you want to read those detail to make your decision on this product just CLICK HERE
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Overview:
- EF mount; wide-angle lens
- Inner focusing; floating system
- 24mm focal length
- f/2.8 maximum aperture
- Overall linear extension system with Autofocus drive
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews, On Sale Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, buy Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras best buy, Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Discount, Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras For Sale
Best Shimano Reels Bobs Furniture Reviews Camping Tents Reviews
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
115 of 117 people found the following review helpful 
Bang for few bucks..., May 14, 2005 By Careful Critic (Lexington) - See all my reviews This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) This is a cheap lens - old design, very plastic - that can prove terribly useful for those on a budget who want a wider perspective, especially on 1.6x crop factor dSLRs.
I learned about "cheap" with this lens - broke the focus ring the day after delivery. But I blame myself too, and the replacement's given me no trouble, though I think my first one was a bit sharper than the second. (Update: calibration of the replacement optimized my performance to match or exceed that first one that I broke. It now performs *very well* wide-open at f/2.8, and beyond belief at f/5.6.)
By many standards, this lens will match or exceed zoom lens of comparable price (as a prime lens should). Autofocus is a little buzzy, but the main time you'll notice is when it loses its bearing and suddenly lurches way off target. Mostly, focuses quickly enough and well. Some chromatic aberration in worst-case scenarios, but nothing awful or unexpected. Vignetting, even on a 1.6x crop,... Read more
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful Mr Watson, come here, I need to see you, June 16, 2010 By This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I was on the lookout for a good-quality autofocus wide angle lens for my Canon 5D MkII, and this seemed to be the best option. Canon's telephoto lenses are generally superb and they make some good zooms, but the company has traditionally had trouble with the wider focal lengths. I can't justify the expense of a 24-70mm f/2.8 or the 24mm f/1.4, and the 17-40mm and 16-35mm seem either underwhelming or too specialised for what they are. The 28-135mm didn't appeal to me, ditto the 20-35mm f/3.4-4.5, the 24-85mm didn't impress me when I owned a copy. The non-L wide primes include the 20mm f/2.8, which no-one seems to like; the 35mm f/2, which lots of people like but doesn't seem great in the full-frame corners; the 28mm f/2.8, which I have tried and hated, and the 28mm f/1.8, which doesn't appeal to me at all. The 24mm f/2.8 seemed to be the dark horse, based on the tests I have seen, and so I found one cheap and snapped it up.
It is surprisingly good. Not excellent, but... Read more
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful 
If only vigneting could be reduced..., December 6, 2005 By This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I bought this lens to have a fixed, light lens to use with my digital EOS 10D (due to 1.6 crop factor it has the same viewing angle than a 45 mm lens, in the "standard" range). I use it in "keep it simple" photographic sessions.
Resolution and overall image quality are quite decent; but it has one main drawback: vigneting is non-negligible at f/2.8, even inside the digital cropped frame (so I can't guess how bad could it be in a full 35 mm frame). At f/4 it becomes usable. I've done a very informal comparison with Canon EF 17-40 L and both lenses give comparable results at f/4.
Design is old, but effective; it has a depth of field scale. I'd like it to have a more silent focus engine, or a somewhat more robust build, but it does its job.
› See all 22 customer reviews...
| 115 of 117 people found the following review helpful Bang for few bucks..., By Careful Critic (Lexington) - See all my reviews This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) This is a cheap lens - old design, very plastic - that can prove terribly useful for those on a budget who want a wider perspective, especially on 1.6x crop factor dSLRs.I learned about "cheap" with this lens - broke the focus ring the day after delivery. But I blame myself too, and the replacement's given me no trouble, though I think my first one was a bit sharper than the second. (Update: calibration of the replacement optimized my performance to match or exceed that first one that I broke. It now performs *very well* wide-open at f/2.8, and beyond belief at f/5.6.) By many standards, this lens will match or exceed zoom lens of comparable price (as a prime lens should). Autofocus is a little buzzy, but the main time you'll notice is when it loses its bearing and suddenly lurches way off target. Mostly, focuses quickly enough and well. Some chromatic aberration in worst-case scenarios, but nothing awful or unexpected. Vignetting, even on a 1.6x crop,... Read more 16 of 16 people found the following review helpful Mr Watson, come here, I need to see you, By This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I was on the lookout for a good-quality autofocus wide angle lens for my Canon 5D MkII, and this seemed to be the best option. Canon's telephoto lenses are generally superb and they make some good zooms, but the company has traditionally had trouble with the wider focal lengths. I can't justify the expense of a 24-70mm f/2.8 or the 24mm f/1.4, and the 17-40mm and 16-35mm seem either underwhelming or too specialised for what they are. The 28-135mm didn't appeal to me, ditto the 20-35mm f/3.4-4.5, the 24-85mm didn't impress me when I owned a copy. The non-L wide primes include the 20mm f/2.8, which no-one seems to like; the 35mm f/2, which lots of people like but doesn't seem great in the full-frame corners; the 28mm f/2.8, which I have tried and hated, and the 28mm f/1.8, which doesn't appeal to me at all. The 24mm f/2.8 seemed to be the dark horse, based on the tests I have seen, and so I found one cheap and snapped it up.It is surprisingly good. Not excellent, but... Read more 22 of 24 people found the following review helpful If only vigneting could be reduced..., By This review is from: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I bought this lens to have a fixed, light lens to use with my digital EOS 10D (due to 1.6 crop factor it has the same viewing angle than a 45 mm lens, in the "standard" range). I use it in "keep it simple" photographic sessions.Resolution and overall image quality are quite decent; but it has one main drawback: vigneting is non-negligible at f/2.8, even inside the digital cropped frame (so I can't guess how bad could it be in a full 35 mm frame). At f/4 it becomes usable. I've done a very informal comparison with Canon EF 17-40 L and both lenses give comparable results at f/4. Design is old, but effective; it has a depth of field scale. I'd like it to have a more silent focus engine, or a somewhat more robust build, but it does its job. |
› See all 22 customer reviews...
